â¦
Barolsky, Walter Pater's Renaissance,130-133
â¦
Gregory, The Life and Works of DGR
II. 109
â¦
Hardinge, âLouvre Sonnets of DGRâ,â (1891), 433-443
â¦
Ireland, âDGR's Versions of Giorgione,â (1979), 303-315
â¦
Landow, âRossetti's Typological Structures,â (1978), 257-258
â¦
Riede, DGR and the Limits of Victorian Vision,217
â¦
Stein, Ritual of Interpretation., 19-23
â¦
Wagner, A Moment's Monument
147-148)
This collection contains 51 texts and images, including:
1881 Poems First Edition text
Louvre oil
Scholarly Commentary
IntroductionÂ
When DGR saw the picture in the Louvre he wrote to his brother that it was âso intensely fine that I condescended to sit down before it and write a sonnet. You have heard me rave about the engraving before, and I fancy have seen it yourself. There is a woman, naked, at one side, who is dipping a glass vessel into a well; and in the centre two men and another naked woman, who seem to have paused for a moment in playing on the musical instrumentsâ ( Fredeman, Correspondence 49. 18 , letter of 8 October 1849).
The sonnet is very Keatsian in its appreciation of art, or aesthetic space, as emblematic of an âimmortalityâ unavailable to flesh and blood humans. As in the âOde on A Grecian Urn,â here DGR suggests that the painting's figures, in particular the woman dipping the water pitcher, seem half-conscious of their aesthetic condition. To the degree that the woman is conscious, to that extent she recalls âThe Blessed Damozelâ, whose emparadised state is transacted by a melancholy that arises because her lover is not with her. In this sonnet the woman's purely imaginative status refines the textual melancholy to an exquisite degree. The injunction at lines 12-13 is made as if to suggest that the reader/viewer must not break the spell of her aesthesis, as if to suggest that the spell of art is itself as fragile as any living being, and might be broken.
Textual History: CompositionÂ
DGR wrote the sonnet in front of the picture early in October 1849, during his stay in Paris. Two manuscripts survive: the fair copy in DGR's letter to his brother of 8 October 1849 (the earliest copy), and the corrected copy gathered in the Fitzwilliam Museum's bound volume of DGR manuscripts relating (mostly) âThe House of Lifeâ sonnets. The latter show the revisions DGR made for publication in the 1870 Poems.
A copy made by WMR sometime in the early twentieth-century exhibits both the version published in 1850 and the later version published in 1870.
Textual History: RevisionÂ
The major revisions were made before the poem was first set in type (in the Penkill Proofs, August 1869), but further changes came as the text went through the proof process of 1869-70 (which eventuated in the publication of the 1870 Poems). The version printed in the Germ no. 4 (1850) is very close to the initial composition, though it does show variations at several points. Kenneth Ireland sees the 1850 version as far truer to the original painting than the 1870 text.
Printing HistoryÂ
First published in the Germ no. 4 (30 April 1850). DGR reprinted the poem in the Penkill Proofs, where its text is already much closer to the received version than to the Germ text. The proof process of 1869-1870, toward the publicaton of the 1870 Poems, resulted in the work as received.
PictorialÂ
The painting was once firmly attributed to Giorgione, and indeed Berenson preserves the attribution. But scholars now generally assign the work to Titian. It is often known by the title Pastorale, and is sometimes called Fête Champêtre. Seen as Titian's work it is dated early sixteenth-century, shortly after the death of Giorgione. The work is read as Titian's act of homage to his great predecessor. Whatever the personal attribution, however, the painting is an important instance of what Pater famously labelled âThe School of Giorgioneâ, which introduced a powerfully poetic element into pictorial space.